On 08/29/2014 11:22 PM, J David wrote:
So an even number N of monitors doesn't give you any better fault
resilience than N-1 monitors. And the more monitors you have, the
more traffic there is between them. So when N is even, N monitors
consume more resources and provide no extra benefit compared to N-1
monitors.
Except for more copies ;)
But yeah, if you're going with 2 or 4, you'll be better off with 3 or 5.
As long as you don't go with 1 you should be okay. Only go with 1 if
you're truly okay with losing whatever you're storing if that one
monitor's disk is fried.
-Joao
--
Joao Eduardo Luis
Software Engineer | http://inktank.com | http://ceph.com
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
