Hi Mark, Yeah. The application defines portals which are active threaded, then the transport layer is servicing the portals with EPOLL.
Matt ----- "Mark Nelson" <mark.nel...@inktank.com> wrote: > Excellent, I've been meaning to check into how the TCP transport is > going. Are you using a hybrid threadpool/epoll approach? That I > suspect would be very effective at reducing context switching, > especially compared to what we do now. > > Mark > > On 08/28/2014 10:40 PM, Matt W. Benjamin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > There's also an early-stage TCP transport implementation for > Accelio, also EPOLL-based. (We haven't attempted to run Ceph > protocols over it yet, to my knowledge, but it should be > straightforward.) > > > > Regards, > > > > Matt > > > > ----- "Haomai Wang" <haomaiw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi Roy, > >> > >> > >> As for messenger level, I have some very early works on > >> it(https://github.com/yuyuyu101/ceph/tree/msg-event), it contains > a > >> new messenger implementation which support different event > mechanism. > >> It looks like at least one more week to make it work. > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com -- Matt Benjamin The Linux Box 206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150 Ann Arbor, MI 48104 http://linuxbox.com tel. 734-761-4689 fax. 734-769-8938 cel. 734-216-5309 _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
