On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Ilya Dryomov <ilya.dryo...@inktank.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Ilya Dryomov <ilya.dryo...@inktank.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Gregory Farnum <g...@inktank.com> wrote:
>>> We appear to have solved this and then immediately re-broken it by
>>> ensuring that the userspace daemons will set a new required feature
>>> bit if there are any EC rules in the OSDMap. I was going to say
>>> there's a ticket open for it, but I can't find one...
>>
>> Larry did not mention EC pools, and regardless, it returns EIO, which
>> probably means it's failing past the feature bit check. (3.2, which is
>> the kernel Larry is on, goes into retry/backoff loop if the features
>> are missing.) That said, we need to re-fix the EC problem ;)
>
> Oh, it *does* return EIO eventually, I just never waited long enough
> for it to return.. Greg, I assume you are referring to CRUSH_V2 when
> talking about "a new required feature bit if there are any EC rules in
> the OSDMap"?
On a separate note, I'm going to have to fix the kernel client to
return something more appropriate than EIO. And retrying a few times
before saything "this is not supported" is bogus, I'll fix that too.
Thanks,
Ilya
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
