I've found nothing related in Apache logs, I believe it's something related to Radosgw, Anyone else tested the same thing on owned Radosgw?
Regards On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Mark Nelson <mark.nel...@inktank.com>wrote: > I'm not really an apache expert, but you could try looking at the apache > and rgw logs and see if you can trace where the 2nd request is hanging up. > Also, just to be sure, both clients can download data independently, just > not together? > > Mark > > > On 10/28/2013 02:54 PM, hadi golestani wrote: > >> I'm running Ubuntu 12 on all my nodes and I've just installed every >> package with default configs like what is mentioned in quick installtion >> guide of Ceph >> Anyone else experiancing the same issue? >> >> Regards >> >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Mark Nelson <mark.nel...@inktank.com >> <mailto:mark.nelson@inktank.**com <mark.nel...@inktank.com>>> wrote: >> >> Strange! I'm not sure I've actually ever seen two concurrent >> downloads fail to work properly. Is there anything unusual about >> the setup? >> >> Mark >> >> >> On 10/28/2013 01:58 PM, hadi golestani wrote: >> >> My test is so simple, >> On a cluster with 3 MON, 4 OSD, 1 RGW I can't download a big >> file from >> two different clients concurrently, >> One of them will wait till the other finish downloading it. >> >> Regards >> >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 10:19 PM, Mark Nelson >> <mark.nel...@inktank.com >> <mailto:mark.nelson@inktank.**com<mark.nel...@inktank.com> >> > >> <mailto:mark.nelson@inktank.__**com >> >> <mailto:mark.nelson@inktank.**com <mark.nel...@inktank.com>>>> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Hadi, >> >> Can you tell me a bit about the tests you are doing and >> seeing poor >> performance on? >> >> Mark >> >> >> On 10/28/2013 01:32 PM, hadi golestani wrote: >> >> Any answer to this question? I'm hitting almost the >> same issue >> with radosgw, >> Read performance is not fine with radosgw >> >> Regards >> >> ______________________________**_____________________ >> >> ceph-users mailing list >> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >> <mailto:ceph-us...@lists.ceph.**com<ceph-users@lists.ceph.com> >> > >> <mailto:ceph-us...@lists.ceph.**__com >> <mailto:ceph-us...@lists.ceph.**com <ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>>> >> http://lists.ceph.com/____**listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph._** >> ___com <http://lists.ceph.com/____listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.____com> >> >> <http://lists.ceph.com/__**listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph._**_com<http://lists.ceph.com/__listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.__com> >> > >> >> >> <http://lists.ceph.com/__**listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph._**_com<http://lists.ceph.com/__listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.__com> >> >> <http://lists.ceph.com/**listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.**com<http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com> >> >> >> >> >> ______________________________**_____________________ >> >> ceph-users mailing list >> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >> <mailto:ceph-us...@lists.ceph.**com<ceph-users@lists.ceph.com> >> > >> <mailto:ceph-us...@lists.ceph.**__com >> <mailto:ceph-us...@lists.ceph.**com <ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>>> >> http://lists.ceph.com/____**listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph._** >> ___com <http://lists.ceph.com/____listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.____com> >> >> <http://lists.ceph.com/__**listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph._**_com<http://lists.ceph.com/__listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.__com> >> > >> <http://lists.ceph.com/__**listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph._** >> _com <http://lists.ceph.com/__listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.__com> >> >> <http://lists.ceph.com/**listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.**com<http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
