Thanks everyone ,
I think `umount -l` is the error,we shouldn't just do this operation
without any other conjunction operation.
I will continue to do more extreme test. I shouldn't exec `umount -l` ,
and I need to stop anyone to exec `umount -l`.
Lots of thanks !
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Michael Lowe <j.michael.l...@gmail.com>
Date: 2013/10/8
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Data loss after force umount !
To: higkoohk <higko...@gmail.com>
It won't unmount until the processes with open files exit, umount -l is
usually used in conjunction with lsof and kill. You probably didn't
actually get the file system unmounted.
Sent from my iPad
On Oct 7, 2013, at 9:40 PM, higkoohk <higko...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Michael ,
umount -l : Lazy unmount. Detach the filesystem from the filesystem
hierarchy now, and cleanup all references to the filesystem as soon as it
is not busy anymore.
Do you mean '-f' ?
umount -f : Force unmount (in case of an unreachable NFS system).
But what do I do when `umount -l` be exec ?
2013/10/8 Michael Lowe <j.michael.l...@gmail.com>
That doesn't force the unmount.
Sent from my iPad
2013/10/8 Yan, Zheng <uker...@gmail.com>
>
> 2013-10-8 上午9:00于 "higkoohk" <higko...@gmail.com>写道：
>
> >
> > Thanks everyone, the env like this :
> >
> > Linux 3.0.97-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64 CentOS 6.4
> >
> > ceph version 0.61.7 (8f010aff684e820ecc837c25ac77c7a05d7191ff)
> >
> > /dev/sdd1 on /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-2 type xfs (rw)
> > /dev/sdb1 on /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-3 type xfs (rw)
> > /dev/sdc1 on /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-4 type xfs (rw)
> >
> > meta-data=/dev/sdb1 isize=2048 agcount=4, agsize=8895321
> blks
> > = sectsz=512 attr=2, projid32bit=0
> > data = bsize=4096 blocks=35581281, imaxpct=25
> > = sunit=0 swidth=0 blks
> > naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0
> > log =internal bsize=4096 blocks=17373, version=2
> > = sectsz=512 sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=1
> > realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0
> >
> > /usr/libexec/qemu-kvm -name centos6-clone2 -S -machine
> rhel6.4.0,accel=kvm -m 1000 -smp 2,sockets=2,cores=1,threads=1 -uuid
> dd1a7093-bdea-4816-8a62-df61cb0c9bfa -nodefconfig -nodefaults -chardev
> socket,id=charmonitor,path=/var/lib/libvirt/qemu/centos6-clone2.monitor,server,nowait
> -mon chardev=charmonitor,id=monitor,mode=control -rtc base=utc -no-shutdown
> -device piix3-usb-uhci,id=usb,bus=pci.0,addr=0x1.0x2 -drive
> file=rbd:rbd/centos6-clone2:auth_supported=none:mon_host=
> agent21.kisops.org\:6789,if=none,id=drive-virtio-disk0 -device
> virtio-blk-pci,scsi=off,bus=pci.0,addr=0x4,drive=drive-virtio-disk0,id=virtio-disk0,bootindex=1
> -netdev tap,fd=22,id=hostnet0,vhost=on,vhostfd=23 -device
> virtio-net-pci,netdev=hostnet0,id=net0,mac=52:54:00:5c:71:f1,bus=pci.0,addr=0x3
> -vnc 0.0.0.0:0 -vga cirrus -device
> virtio-balloon-pci,id=balloon0,bus=pci.0,addr=0x5
> >
> > Use `umount -l` to force umount.
>
> `umount -l` is not force umount, it just detach the fs from the hierarchy.
> The fs is mounted internelly in the kernel if there still are references.
> I'm not surprise the fs errors If you use `umount -l` to umount the rbd in
> one guest, then mount the rbd in another guest.
>
> Yan, zheng
>
> >
> > Anything else ?
> >
> >
> > 2013/10/8 Mark Nelson <mark.nel...@inktank.com>
> >>
> >> Also, mkfs, mount, and kvm disk options?
> >>
> >> Mark
> >>
> >>
> >> On 10/07/2013 03:15 PM, Samuel Just wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Sounds like it's probably an issue with the fs on the rbd disk? What
> >>> fs was the vm using on the rbd?
> >>> -Sam
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 8:11 AM, higkoohk <higko...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> We use ceph as the storage of kvm .
> >>>>
> >>>> I found the VMs errors when force umount the ceph disk.
> >>>>
> >>>> Is it just right ? How to repair it ?
> >>>>
> >>>> Many thanks .
> >>>>
> >>>> --higkoo
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
