Hi Xiaoxi, Wheats,

you hit the right point: We are looking for an Enterprise Linux distribution as 
base for Ceph.
RHEL and CentOS has a very broad distribution and a high acceptance in the Data 
Center due to our observation.

The pain of this distro (from Ceph point of view) is the old kernel.
As you know a 'new' kernel ( >= 3.6) is mandatory for stability and features of 
the Kernel CephFS and RBD (and btrfs).

So, we decided to use a very stable distro (CentOS-6.4) and combine it with a 
new, but mature/stable kernel (3.8.13).

I'm running fedora on my Laptop:
Linux oder 3.9.9-301.fc19.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Jul 4 15:10:36 UTC 2013 x86_64 
x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
but as you said it is "too aggressive".
Another aspect might be our good knowledge on RHEL and small experience with 
Ubuntu.

It is our goal to run all three presentation layers Block/File/Object in one 
Ceph cluster.
We have good experience with block and file and also the performance looks quit 
well:

[root@rx37-4 ~]# ceph osd dump | grep SAS-group-2
pool 5 'SAS-group-2' rep size 2 min_size 1 crush_ruleset 4 object_hash rjenkins 
pg_num 3300 pgp_num 3300 last_change 306 owner 0

[root@rx37-2 cephfs]# dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/cephfs/sas-pool-5/file1 
bs=4194304 count=10240
10240+0 records in
10240+0 records out
42949672960 bytes (43 GB) copied, 23.8877 s, 1.8 GB/s

[root@rx37-2 ~]# df -k | grep ceph
10.10.38.13:/        40253585408 2546787328 37706798080   7% /mnt/cephfs

Cheers,
-Dieter


On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 08:27:52AM +0200, Chen, Xiaoxi wrote:
> Hi Dieter,
>     Thanks a lot for the information. Could I learn more about your use case 
> ? Would you care performance ?
>     And may I know why you want CentOS+ Custom kernel ? 
>     I thought people use CentOS for stability concern but if using CentOS + 
> Custom Kernel, 
>     why don't you just use Ubuntu or Fedora(although Fedora is usually too 
> aggressive).
>                                                                       Xiaoxi
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org 
> [mailto:ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Kasper Dieter
> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 2:17 PM
> To: Chen, Xiaoxi
> Cc: ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org; ceph-us...@ceph.com
> Subject: Re: Any concern about Ceph on CentOS
> 
> Hi Xiaoxi,
> 
> we are really running Ceph on CentOS-6.4
> (6 server nodes, 3 client nodes, 160 OSDs).
> 
> We put a 3.8.13 Kernel on top and installed the ceph-0.61.4 cluster with 
> mkcephfs, because ceph-deploy seems to be still very buggy and has big 
> dependencies to the newest python.
> 
> ceph.ko
> rbd.ko
> and ceph-fuse are running fast, well and stable (so far ;-) ).
> 
> Cheers,
> -Dieter
> 
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 03:18:22AM +0200, Chen, Xiaoxi wrote:
> > Hi list,
> >    I would like to ask if anyone really run Ceph on CentOS/RHEL? 
> >    Since the kernel version for Cent/RHEL is much older than that of 
> > Ubuntu, 
> >    I am thinking about whether we have some known performance/functionality 
> > issue?
> >    Thanks for everyone could share your insight for Ceph+CentOS.
> >                                                                             
> >                                                                             
> >                                                                     Xiaoxi
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" 
> > in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo 
> > info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the 
> body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at  
> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to