On 03/05/2013 12:27 PM, Dino Yancey wrote: > The only two features I'd deem necessary for our workload would be > stable distributed metadata / MDS and a working fsck equivalent. > Snapshots would be great once the feature is deemed stable, as would > nfs / cifs reexport, and quota support eventually would be nice to > have. Anything else is gravy.
I need to a) get cephfs back-ported to at least 3.0 kernels as this is the only version feasible on centos 6 & co, and b) control data placement down to specific osd. -- Dimitri Maziuk Programmer/sysadmin BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
