HI guys.

Should ceph propagate inotify/logs "backwards" across all client-mounts? Say... clientA locks -> mount -> ceph fs <- mount <- clientB gets/sees the file has a lock/inotify does that make sense and if so & ceph should do that - what have I missed, possibly, for I do not get this behaviour.

many thanks, L.
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to