On Thu, Feb 19, 2026 at 9:00 PM Laura Flores via Dev <[email protected]> wrote:

> I reviewed the upgrade suites. There were some infrastructure problems
> that affected a significant number of the results, which I think we should
> get fixed before we approve the upgrades.
>
> @David Galloway <[email protected]>, the main issue is that we are
> missing packages/containers for Quincy and Pacific. See details in
> https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/75034
> <https://qcflzmq6.r.us-east-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Ftracker.ceph.com%2Fissues%2F75034/1/0100019c777d9e26-573a43dc-1e9b-4062-9de7-2559520fc0a5-000000/E8HF8NYI-pW4w0BgN7Se41EkWRA=466>
> .
>
> The reef point-to-point tests did not have any infrastructure failures,
> but there were two new bugs that I raised for RBD and the Dashboard. @Ilya
> Dryomov <[email protected]>  and @[email protected] <[email protected]>, can you
> take a look?
>
> *upgrade:quincy-x*
> 1. https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/75034
> <https://qcflzmq6.r.us-east-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Ftracker.ceph.com%2Fissues%2F75034/2/0100019c777d9e26-573a43dc-1e9b-4062-9de7-2559520fc0a5-000000/UUcPCw7uyvIGAcxlWNntchK6v90=466>
>  -
> Missing packages and container images in upgrade tests - (Infrastructure)
>
> *upgrade:pacific-x*
> 1. https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/75034
> <https://qcflzmq6.r.us-east-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Ftracker.ceph.com%2Fissues%2F75034/3/0100019c777d9e26-573a43dc-1e9b-4062-9de7-2559520fc0a5-000000/C76yMyOupDETiidC1BSvPFbLZ7M=466>
>  -
> Missing packages and container images in upgrade tests - (Infrastructure)
>
> *upgrade:reef-p2p*
> 1. https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/75037
> <https://qcflzmq6.r.us-east-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Ftracker.ceph.com%2Fissues%2F75037/1/0100019c777d9e26-573a43dc-1e9b-4062-9de7-2559520fc0a5-000000/M0Ke643EdMp-5mkJt-o-qNYCgSE=466>
>  -
> src/test/pybind/test_rbd.py::test_remove_canceled fails from coredump -
> (rbd)
>
Hi Laura,

I think this is the same thing that I have noted in an earlier email in
this thread:

> [...] but the crashes in test_librbd_python.sh are concerning.
> Patrick and I discussed them briefly -- they seem to be specific to
> 20.04, but I don't remember seeing them before.  There were multiple
> passes on 20.04 in the run that I approved last year [2], so it looks
> like something around Python, Cython or the build process has changed
> in the interim.
>
> [1]
https://pulpito.ceph.com/dis-2026-02-02_19:37:16-rbd-reef-release-distro-default-trial/
> [2]
https://pulpito.ceph.com/yuriw-2025-11-18_23:00:18-rbd-reef-release-distro-default-smithi/

--
Ilya
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to