----- Le 25 Mar 25, à 10:59, Илья Безруков rbe...@gmail.com a écrit :
> ------------------------------ > > Hello Janne, > > We only have a single network configured for our OSDs: > > ```sh > ceph config get osd public_network172.20.180.0/24 > > ceph config get osd cluster_network172.20.180.0/24 > ``` > > However, in the output of ceph health detail, we see multiple networks > being checked: > > ```sh > ceph health detail > HEALTH_OK (muted: OSD_UNREACHABLE) > (MUTED, STICKY) [ERR] OSD_UNREACHABLE: 32 osds(s) are not reachable > osd.0's public address is not in '172.20.180.1/32,172.20.180.0/24' subnet > ``` > > We are unsure where 172.20.180.1/32 is coming from. > > Any ideas on where to look next? > Thanks for your response. Hi, Have you check for 172.20.180.1/32 in ceph.conf files? Regards, Frédéric. > > пн, 24 мар. 2025 г. в 09:45, Janne Johansson <icepic...@gmail.com>: > >> > Hello everyone, >> > >> > After upgrading our Ceph cluster from 17.2.7 to 17.2.8 using `cephadm`, >> all >> > OSDs are reported as unreachable with the following error: >> > >> > ``` >> > HEALTH_ERR 32 osds(s) are not reachable >> > [ERR] OSD_UNREACHABLE: 32 osds(s) are not reachable >> > osd.0's public address is not in '172.20.180.1/32,172.20.180.0/24' >> > subnet >> > osd.1's public address is not in '172.20.180.1/32,172.20.180.0/24' >> > subnet >> > ... >> > osd.31's public address is not in '172.20.180.1/32,172.20.180.0/24' >> > subnet >> > ``` >> > >> > However, all OSDs actually have IP addresses within the ` >> 172.20.180.0/24` <http://172.20.180.0/24> >> > subnet. The cluster remains functional (CephFS is accessible), and muting >> > the warning with `ceph health mute OSD_UNREACHABLE --sticky` allows >> normal >> > operation, but the underlying issue persists. >> >> > ### **Questions** >> > 1. Has anyone else encountered this issue after upgrading to 17.2.8? >> >> Yes, we ran into it also. It "only" reads the first entry and skips >> the second (and third and so on) >> >> > 2. Is this a known regression? (This seems similar to issue #67517.) >> > 3. Would upgrading to Ceph 18.x (Reef) resolve the problem? >> > 4. Is there any solution other than muting the health warning? >> >> We widened the netmask to cover both nets so we would have them in one >> definition. >> >> -- >> May the most significant bit of your life be positive. >> > > > -- > С уважением, > Илья Безруков > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
