I'd start with 3+2, so you have one node left for recovery in case one fails. 6-node and 90 hdd per node sounds like a long recovery that needs to be tested for sure.
On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 at 06:10, Phong Tran Thanh <tranphong...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi community, > > Please help with advice on selecting an erasure coding algorithm for a > 6-node cluster with 540 OSDs. What would be the appropriate values for *k* > and *m*? The cluster requires a high level of HA and consistent > throughput. > > Email: tranphong...@gmail.com > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io > -- Łukasz Borek luk...@borek.org.pl _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
