On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 12:54 PM Sake Ceph <c...@paulusma.eu> wrote:
> We're looking for the multiple mds daemons to be active in zone A and > standby(-replay) in zone B. > This scenario would also benefit people who have more powerfull hardware > in zone A than zone B. > > Kind regards, > Sake > > > Op 31-10-2024 15:50 CET schreef Adam King <adk...@redhat.com>: > > > > > > Just noticed this thread. A couple questions. Is what we want to have MDS > > daemons in say zone A and zone B, but the ones in zone A are prioritized > to > > be active and ones in zone B remain as standby unless absolutely > necessary > > (all the ones in zone A are down) or is it that we want to have some > subset > > of a pool of hosts in zone A and zone B have mds daemons? If it's the > > former, cephadm doesn't do it. The followup question in that case would > be > > if there is some way to tell the mds daemons to prioritize certain ones > to > > be active over others? If there is, I didn't know about it, but I assume > > we'd need that functionality to get that case to work. > You used to be able to do something like this in Ceph with the standby_for_[name|rank] params, but it looks like that got removed a while ago. Patrick, is there a new way to make this happen with the mds_join_fs paradigm? -Greg _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
