You may want to consider disabling deep scrubs and scrubs while attempting to complete a backfill operation.
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023, at 01:46, Eugen Block wrote: > I didn't mean you should split your PGs now, that won't help because > there is already backfilling going on. I would revert the pg_num > changes (since nothing actually happened yet there's no big risk) and > wait for the backfill to finish. You don't seem to have inactive PGs > so it shouldn't be an issue as long as nothing else breaks down. Do > you see progress of the backfilling? Do the numbers of misplaced > objects change? > > Zitat von xadhoo...@gmail.com: > >> Thanks, I try to change the pg and pgp number to an higher value but >> pg do not increase.... >> ta: >> pools: 8 pools, 1085 pgs >> objects: 242.28M objects, 177 TiB >> usage: 553 TiB used, 521 TiB / 1.0 PiB avail >> pgs: 635281/726849381 objects degraded (0.087%) >> 91498351/726849381 objects misplaced (12.588%) >> 773 active+clean >> 288 active+remapped+backfilling >> 11 active+clean+scrubbing+deep >> 10 active+clean+scrubbing >> 3 active+undersized+degraded+remapped+backfilling >> >> >> still have those 3 pg in stuck >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io >> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io > > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
