Hi,

Thank you guys. I deployed a third monitor and failover works. Thanks you

Le mar. 15 juin 2021 à 16:15, Christoph Brüning <
christoph.bruen...@uni-wuerzburg.de> a écrit :

> Hi,
>
> That's right!
>
> We're currently evaluating a similar setup with two identical HW nodes
> (on two different sites), with OSD, MON and MDS each, and both nodes
> have CephFS mounted.
>
> The goal is to build a minimal self-contained shared filesystem that
> remains online during planned updates and can somehow survive should
> disaster strike at one of the two sites.
>
> We added a third node (a small VM) running only a monitor to avoid
> exactly the described problem.
>
> Best,
> Christoph
>
>
>
> On 15/06/2021 15.32, Robert Sander wrote:
> > On 15.06.21 15:16, nORKy wrote:
> >
> >> Why is there no failover ??
> >
> > Because only one MON out of two is not in the majority to build a quorum.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
> > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
> >
>
> --
> Dr. Christoph Brüning
> Universität Würzburg
> HPC & DataManagement @ ct.qmat & RZUW
> Am Hubland
> D-97074 Würzburg
> Tel.: +49 931 31-80499
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io

Reply via email to