Hi, > * Ceph users will benefit from both approaches being supported into the future
this is rather important for us as well. we use systemd-nspawn based containers (that act and are managed like traditional VMs, just without the overhead). cephadm enforces not just containers, but particular ones (granted, docker/podman are the currently most used container-runtimes). it would be nice if cephadm would, like cephdeploy did, support "traditional"/plain systems (which then automatically works perfectly for us with systemd-nspawn without any changes). until now we've still used ceph-deply and stayed away from cephadm, as it would require us to completely change our system deployment. Regards, Daniel _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
