Have you tried a more aggressive reweight value? I've seen some stubborn crush maps that don't start moving date until 0.9 or lower in some cases.
Reed > On Mar 11, 2021, at 10:29 AM, Brent Kennedy <bkenn...@cfl.rr.com> wrote: > > We have a ceph octopus cluster running 15.2.6, its indicating a near full > osd which I can see is not weighted equally with the rest of the osds. I > tried to do the usual "ceph osd reweight osd.0 0.95" to force it down a > little bit, but unlike the nautilus clusters, I see no data movement when > issuing the command. If I run a ceph osd tree, it shows the reweight > setting, but no data movement appears to be occurring. > > > > Is there some new thing in ocotopus I am missing? I looked through the > release notes for .7, .8 and .9 and didn't see any fixes that jumped out as > resolving a bug related to this. The Octopus cluster was deployed using > ceph-ansible and upgraded to 15.2.6. I plan to upgrade to 15.2.9 in the > coming month. > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > Regards, > > -Brent > > > > Existing Clusters: > > Test: Ocotpus 15.2.5 ( all virtual on nvme ) > > US Production(HDD): Nautilus 14.2.11 with 11 osd servers, 3 mons, 4 > gateways, 2 iscsi gateways > > UK Production(HDD): Nautilus 14.2.11 with 18 osd servers, 3 mons, 4 > gateways, 2 iscsi gateways > > US Production(SSD): Nautilus 14.2.11 with 6 osd servers, 3 mons, 4 gateways, > 2 iscsi gateways > > UK Production(SSD): Octopus 15.2.6 with 5 osd servers, 3 mons, 4 gateways > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
