Hi together, I had a look at ceph-fuse code and if I read it correctly, it does indeed not seem to have the relatime behaviour since kernels 2.6.30 implemented. Should I open a ticket on this?
Cheers,
Oliver
Am 02.12.19 um 14:31 schrieb Oliver Freyermuth:
> I was thinking about the behaviour of relatime on kernels since 2.6.30
> (quoting mount(8)):
> --------------------
> "Update inode access times relative to modify or change time. Access time is
> only updated if the previous access time was earlier than the current modify
> or change time. (Similar to
> noatime, but it doesn't break mutt or other applications that need to know
> if a file has been read since the last time it was modified.)
>
> Since Linux 2.6.30, the kernel defaults to the behavior provided by this
> option (unless noatime was specified),
> and the strictatime option is required to obtain traditional semantics. In
> addition, since
> Linux 2.6.30, the file's last access time is always updated if it is more
> than 1 day old."
> --------------------
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
