We are not using jumbo frames anywhere on this cluster (all mtu 1500). The
cluster was originally built in October of 2016 and has the following history:
2016-10-04: Created with Hammer (0.94.3)
2017-05-03: Upgraded to Hammer (0.94.10)
2017-10-09: Upgraded to Jewel (10.2.9)
2017-11-02: Upgraded to Jewel (10.2.10)
2018-04-30: Upgraded to Luminous (12.2.5)
2018-09-05: Upgraded to Luminous (12.2.8)
2019-04-05: Upgraded to Luminous (12.2.11)
2019-04-18: Upgraded to Luminous (12.2.12)
2019-07-26: Upgraded to Nautilus (14.2.2)
It wasn't until after the Nautilus upgrade when this problem started showing up.
Here's the output you requested:
[root@a2mon002 ~]# ceph -s
cluster:
id: XXXXXXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXXXXXXXXXX
health: HEALTH_ERR
nodown,norebalance,noscrub,nodeep-scrub flag(s) set
1 nearfull osd(s)
19 pool(s) nearfull
1 scrub errors
Reduced data availability: 6014 pgs inactive, 3 pgs down, 5958 pgs
peering, 83 pgs stale
Possible data damage: 1 pg inconsistent
Degraded data redundancy: 1601/81648846 objects degraded (0.002%),
4 pgs degraded, 5 pgs undersized
1048 slow requests are blocked > 32 sec
services:
mon: 3 daemons, quorum a2mon002,a2mon003,a2mon004 (age 17m)
mgr: a2mon004(active, since 53m), standbys: a2mon003, a2mon002
mds: cephfs:2 {0=a2mon004=up:active(laggy or
crashed),1=a2mon003=up:active(laggy or crashed)} 1 up:standby
osd: 143 osds: 141 up, 137 in; 486 remapped pgs
flags nodown,norebalance,noscrub,nodeep-scrub
data:
pools: 20 pools, 6288 pgs
objects: 27.22M objects, 98 TiB
usage: 308 TiB used, 114 TiB / 422 TiB avail
pgs: 0.048% pgs unknown
95.611% pgs not active
1601/81648846 objects degraded (0.002%)
53012/81648846 objects misplaced (0.065%)
5379 peering
495 remapped+peering
269 active+clean
75 stale+peering
46 activating
7 stale+remapped+peering
3 unknown
3 active+undersized+degraded
3 down
2 activating+remapped
1 activating+undersized
1 active+clean+scrubbing
1 remapped+inconsistent+peering
1 activating+undersized+degraded
1 stale+activating
1 creating+peering
[root@a2mon002 ~]# ceph versions
{
"mon": {
"ceph version 14.2.2 (4f8fa0a0024755aae7d95567c63f11d6862d55be)
nautilus (stable)": 3
},
"mgr": {
"ceph version 14.2.2 (4f8fa0a0024755aae7d95567c63f11d6862d55be)
nautilus (stable)": 3
},
"osd": {
"ceph version 14.2.2 (4f8fa0a0024755aae7d95567c63f11d6862d55be)
nautilus (stable)": 141
},
"mds": {
"ceph version 14.2.2 (4f8fa0a0024755aae7d95567c63f11d6862d55be)
nautilus (stable)": 1
},
"overall": {
"ceph version 14.2.2 (4f8fa0a0024755aae7d95567c63f11d6862d55be)
nautilus (stable)": 148
}
}
We had seen the slow peering shortly after the Nautilus upgrade, but it
eventually recovered. We then started filling the cluster up to test another
Nautilus bug (https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/41255), but then a disk started
to die (which caused the inconsistent PG). When we marked it out we ran into
this peering problem again, but it seems much worse this time.
Thanks,
Bryan
On Sep 4, 2019, at 11:55 AM, Guilherme Geronimo
<guilherme.geron...@gmail.com<mailto:guilherme.geron...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Notice: This email is from an external sender.
Hey Bryan,
I suppose all nodes are using jumboframes (mtu 9000), right?
I would suggest to check OSD->MON communication.
Can you send the output os these commands for us?
* ceph -s
* ceph versions
[]'s
Arthur (aKa Guilherme Geronimo)
On 04/09/2019 14:18, Bryan Stillwell wrote:
Our test cluster is seeing a problem where peering is going incredibly slow
shortly after upgrading it to Nautilus (14.2.2) from Luminous (12.2.12).
>From what I can tell it seems to be caused by "wait for new map" taking a long
>time. When looking at dump_historic_slow_ops on pretty much any OSD I see
>stuff like this:
# ceph daemon osd.112 dump_historic_slow_ops
[...snip...]
{
"description": "osd_pg_create(e180614 287.4b:177739 287.75:177739
287.1c3:177739 287.1cf:177739 287.1e1:177739 287.2dd:177739 287.2fc:177739
287.342:177739 287.382:177739)",
"initiated_at": "2019-09-03 15:12:41.366514",
"age": 4800.8847047119998,
"duration": 4780.0579745630002,
"type_data": {
"flag_point": "started",
"events": [
{
"time": "2019-09-03 15:12:41.366514",
"event": "initiated"
},
{
"time": "2019-09-03 15:12:41.366514",
"event": "header_read"
},
{
"time": "2019-09-03 15:12:41.366501",
"event": "throttled"
},
{
"time": "2019-09-03 15:12:41.366547",
"event": "all_read"
},
{
"time": "2019-09-03 15:39:03.379456",
"event": "dispatched"
},
{
"time": "2019-09-03 15:39:03.379477",
"event": "wait for new map"
},
{
"time": "2019-09-03 15:39:03.522376",
"event": "wait for new map"
},
{
"time": "2019-09-03 15:53:55.912499",
"event": "wait for new map"
},
{
"time": "2019-09-03 15:59:37.909063",
"event": "wait for new map"
},
{
"time": "2019-09-03 16:00:43.356023",
"event": "wait for new map"
},
{
"time": "2019-09-03 16:20:50.575498",
"event": "wait for new map"
},
{
"time": "2019-09-03 16:31:48.689415",
"event": "started"
},
{
"time": "2019-09-03 16:32:21.424489",
"event": "done"
}
]
}
It always seems to be in osd_pg_create() with multiple "wait for new map"
messages before it finally does something. What could be causing it so long to
get the OSD map? The mons don't appear to be overloaded in any way.
Thanks,
Bryan
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io<mailto:ceph-users@ceph.io>
To unsubscribe send an email to
ceph-users-le...@ceph.io<mailto:ceph-users-le...@ceph.io>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io<mailto:ceph-users@ceph.io>
To unsubscribe send an email to
ceph-users-le...@ceph.io<mailto:ceph-users-le...@ceph.io>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
