output from "ceph osd pool ls detail"

pool 1 'cephfs_data' replicated size 3 min_size 2 crush_rule 0 object_hash
rjenkins pg_num 32 pgp_num 32 last_change 74 lfor 0/64 flags hashpspool
stripe_width 0 application cephfs

pool 2 'cephfs_metadata' replicated size 3 min_size 2 crush_rule 0
object_hash rjenkins pg_num 32 pgp_num 32 last_change 75 lfor 0/67 flags
hashpspool stripe_width 0 application cephfs

On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 6:13 PM Heðin Ejdesgaard Møller <h...@synack.fo>
wrote:

> What's the output of
> ceph osd pool ls detail
>
>
> On hós, 2019-08-29 at 18:06 +0530, Amudhan P wrote:
> > output from "ceph -s "
> >
> >   cluster:
> >     id:     7c138e13-7b98-4309-b591-d4091a1742b4
> >     health: HEALTH_WARN
> >             Degraded data redundancy: 1141587/7723191 objects
> > degraded (14.781%), 15 pgs degraded, 16 pgs undersized
> >
> >   services:
> >     mon: 1 daemons, quorum mon01
> >     mgr: mon01(active)
> >     mds: cephfs-tst-1/1/1 up  {0=mon01=up:active}
> >     osd: 3 osds: 3 up, 3 in; 16 remapped pgs
> >
> >   data:
> >     pools:   2 pools, 64 pgs
> >     objects: 2.57 M objects, 59 GiB
> >     usage:   190 GiB used, 5.3 TiB / 5.5 TiB avail
> >     pgs:     1141587/7723191 objects degraded (14.781%)
> >              48 active+clean
> >              15 active+undersized+degraded+remapped+backfill_wait
> >              1  active+undersized+remapped+backfilling
> >
> >   io:
> >     recovery: 0 B/s, 10 objects/s
> >
> > output from  "ceph osd tree"
> > ID CLASS WEIGHT  TYPE NAME           STATUS REWEIGHT PRI-AFF
> > -1       5.45819 root default
> > -3       1.81940     host test-node1
> >  0   hdd 1.81940         osd.0           up  1.00000 1.00000
> > -5       1.81940     host test-node2
> >  1   hdd 1.81940         osd.1           up  1.00000 1.00000
> > -7       1.81940     host test-node3
> >  2   hdd 1.81940         osd.2           up  1.00000 1.00000
> >
> > failure domain not configured yet, setup is 3 OSD node each with a
> > single disk, 1 node with mon&mds&mgr running.
> > the cluster was healthy until I run a script for creating multiple
> > folders.
> >
> > regards
> > Amudhan
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 5:33 PM Heðin Ejdesgaard Møller <
> > h...@synack.fo> wrote:
> > > In adition to ceph -s, could you provide the output of
> > > ceph osd tree
> > > and specify what your failure domain is ?
> > >
> > > /Heðin
> > >
> > >
> > > On hós, 2019-08-29 at 13:55 +0200, Janne Johansson wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Den tors 29 aug. 2019 kl 13:50 skrev Amudhan P <
> > > amudha...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > I am using ceph version 13.2.6 (mimic) on test setup trying
> > > with
> > > > > cephfs.
> > > > > my ceph health status showing warning .
> > > > >
> > > > > "ceph health"
> > > > > HEALTH_WARN Degraded data redundancy: 1197023/7723191 objects
> > > > > degraded (15.499%)
> > > > >
> > > > > "ceph health detail"
> > > > > HEALTH_WARN Degraded data redundancy: 1197128/7723191 objects
> > > > > degraded (15.500%)
> > > > > PG_DEGRADED Degraded data redundancy: 1197128/7723191 objects
> > > > > degraded (15.500%)
> > > > >     pg 2.0 is stuck undersized for 1076.454929, current state
> > > > > active+undersized+
> > > > >     pg 2.2 is stuck undersized for 1076.456639, current state
> > > > > active+undersized+
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > How does "ceph -s" look?
> > > > It should have more info on what else is wrong.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > May the most significant bit of your life be positive.
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
> > > > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
> > >
>
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io

Reply via email to