Just my quick two cents here.

Technically this is possible which doesn't mean it's a good idea. I
wouldn't use such a setup in a productive environment. I don't think
they'll really save a lot and adding the latency etc on top not sure
this is what they're really looking for.

Just for testing and for giving it a try, sure but for the rest I would
go with a clear "no" instead of encouraging them to do that. 

Maybe you can tell use more about their use-case? What are they looking
for, how large should this get, access protocols etc.

Kai

On 22.08.19 17:12, Brett Chancellor wrote:
> It's certainly possible. It makes things a little more complex though.
> Some questions you may want to consider during the design..
> - Is the customer aware this won't preserve any data on the luns they
> are hoping to reuse.
> - Is the plan to eventually replace the SAN with JBOD, in the same
> systems? If so you may want to make your luns look like the eventual
> drive size and count.
> - Is the plan to use a few systems with SAN and add standalone systems
> later? Then you need to calculate expected speeds and divide between
> failure domains.
> - Is the plan to use a couple of hosts with SAN to save money, and
> have the rest be traditional Ceph storage? If so consider putting the
> SAN hosts all in one failure domain.
> - Depending on the SAN you may consider aligning your failure domains
> to different arrays, switches, or even array directors.
> - Remember to take the hosts network speed into consideration when
> calculating how many luns to put on each host.
>
> Hope that helps.
>
> -Brett
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019, 4:14 AM Mohsen Mottaghi
> <mohsenmotta...@outlook.com <mailto:mohsenmotta...@outlook.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi
>
>
>     Yesterday one of our customers asked us a strange request.  He
>     asked us to use SAN as the Ceph storage space to add the SAN
>     storages it currently has to the cluster and reduce other disk
>     purchase costs.
>
>
>     Anybody know can we do this or not?! And if this is possible how
>     we should start to architect this Strange Ceph?! Is it good or not?!
>
>      
>
>     Thanks for your help.
>
>     Mohsen Mottaghi
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
>     <mailto:ceph-users@ceph.io>
>     To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
>     <mailto:ceph-users-le...@ceph.io>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io

-- 
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D 90409 Nürnberg
GF:Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer, (HRB 247165, AG München)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io

Reply via email to