On 03/06/2013 12:20 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > OK, but in my opinion it is worse if that was a design decision that > is just now being changed. Bugs I can understand, but not choosing to > design a new filesystem with unrealistic limitations.
It's not being changed, per se. A reasonable means of increasing the number of back-references has been implemented. (again, AFAICT) _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
