From: Paul Bijnens <paul.bijn...@xplanation.com> > On 2012-12-06 17:16, John Doe wrote: >> anyone has some successful experience with ionice? >> I tried it with 'idle' (-c 3) parameter. >> When I did a quick test (find /), it seemed to work with frequent pauses (I >> guess waiting for idle). >> But when I used it on my big tar, it made it worse than without... which >> seems counter-intuitive. > > I have good experience with with "ionice -n 7 ...".
I will try but theoreticaly "best effort" should be more intense than "idle". >From a quick test, it seems to be the case But I am using ionice to replace nice... maybe I need to use both. Thx, JD _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
