On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Lamar Owen <lo...@pari.edu> wrote:
>>
> But, having said all of that, it must be said that the SL update
> 'nondisruptive index' is not 100%; it is really close to 100%, but there have
> been a few niggles over the years.

How many things have you had break from a Centos update?

-- 
   Les Mikesell
     lesmikes...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Reply via email to