On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Lamar Owen <lo...@pari.edu> wrote: >> > But, having said all of that, it must be said that the SL update > 'nondisruptive index' is not 100%; it is really close to 100%, but there have > been a few niggles over the years.
How many things have you had break from a Centos update? -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos