On 09/12/2012 05:10 PM, Ryan Palamara wrote: > So it is definitely related to NFS4. If I changed the default mount option to > NFS3 there is no issue. > > When I do a ls -n, I see that the GID of 99 is being used instead of the > correct GID. I thought that a idmapd issues would cause both UID and GID to > be wrong, or could this be causing an issue? > > Any suggestions on what I can do in terms of logging to find what the GID is > that is being returned from the NFS server and how it is trying to map it? > > Thank you, > > Ryan Palamara > ZAIS Group, LLC > 2 Bridge Avenue, Suite 322 > Red Bank, New Jersey 07701 > Phone: (732) 450-7444 > ryan.palam...@zaisgroup.com > > > -----Original Message----- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf > Of Akemi Yagi > Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 11:26 AM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] NFS mounts group name shows as nobody > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 5:29 AM, Barbara Krasovec <barba...@arnes.si> wrote: >> Hello! >> >> The same problem appeared on our system (but both user and group were >> shown as nobody), with same idmapd.conf configured on server and >> client machines, users are in central ldap etc.. It worked fine with nfsv3. >> Then we installed the kernel from elrepo repository (tried both 2.6.39 >> and 3.0) and it now works. > Sounds as if this is not the same issue as the existing one. The known issue > should not apply if both the NFS client and server are part of the > centralized LDAP domain. >
Are you running idmapd (with the domain properly set in idmapd.conf) on *BOTH* the server and the client machines ... and are *BOTH* the server and the client machines set to use LDAP for authentication?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
