On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 21:05 +0100, Michael Lampe wrote: > Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > > > I totally lost you. > > No problem. Play the game of chess like your namesake did so well. :) > > > Please provide specifics, what package, is it in rpm > > or not, details please, so we do not chase out own tails. > > Gimme a trick: How to unregister an implicit but formally unavailable > runtime dependency in a spec file? > > It's there at build time and therfore automatically used. Package builds > fine. But it can only be installed by force, because the implicit > dependency is explicitly recorded in the RPM. I want to get rid of that, > because fixing Intel's stuff is not an option.
Would it be be possible to create a dummy rom that requires the intel-rpm but does provide the dependency? _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
