On Jan 17, 2012, at 4:00 PM, "Hugh E Cruickshank" <h...@forsoft.com> wrote:

> From: Les Mikesell Sent: January 17, 2012 05:56
>> 
>> Big disks are cheap these days - I wouldn't worry that much about the
>> total space that much and you'll still be able to keep a lot online.
> 
> This is true for current hardware however I am attempting to reuse our
> existing hardware that has been pulled from our production systems. It
> tends to be older technology but still usable. In this case, it is a
> set of disk arrays using SCSI3 drives.
> 
>> The db's are probably best handled in a pre-backup script that
>> dumps/compresses them, then excluding the live files - and then even
>> block de-dup won't help.   Pst's are a problem any way you look at
>> them but more because of Outlook's locking than their size.  Backuppc
>> is packaged in EPEL so it's easy to install and shows the compression
>> and file re-use stats so you'll know in a few runs how it will handle
>> your data.
> 
> While all of this is true I was kind of hoping that I could come up
> with something that was more "plug and play". The LessFS looked
> promising. I will continue to check this concept out further (be it
> LessFS, ZFS, or something else) but I am going to be avoiding the bleeding
> edge and can only afford to spend a limited amount of time
> chasing this down before I have to bite the bullet and go with what
> we have.
> 
> Thanks again of your feedback and to all the others who have responded.
> Everyone's comments have been greatly appreciated.

If this is only a 1-2 year temporary solution and the backups will be discarded 
once a permanent solution is obtained then I'm sure it will be OK.

If your thinking of building a long-term backup solution this way then your 
building your castles on a foundation of sand. As backup sets grow and 
hardware/software ages you may find yourself in a technological dead-end unable 
to migrate the data off and unable to continue going forward.

If it is such an essential thing as backups (it's backup data right not 
redundant systems?) then I suggest telling the client to open their wallet 
cause when the shit hits the fan you either have solid backups or you have 
bankruptcy courts.

Buy a Data Domain, Exagrid or Falconstor backup storage appliance with builtin 
compression/de-duplication that is fully supported and has a viable upgrade 
path. Use a good centralized backup platform such as netbackup, networker, etc. 
The investment made in backup is an investment in the business' future.

-Ross

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Reply via email to