On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Lamar Owen <lo...@pari.edu> wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 02, 2011 12:53:29 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Try the other way around: build RHEL from their src rpms, try to run
>> the 3rd party binary...  I thought you said that didn't work.  If you
>> can't rebuild that source so it works, you might as well not use open
>> source.
>
> Ok, let me get this straight:  you want open source on your OS but don't care 
> about it for third party apps?  If you have the third party source, you can 
> rebuild it too.  If you're using a closed source third party apps then doing 
> the same thing with the OS shouldn't be a problem.

I don't care in general, but dislike hypocrisy.   If you are going to
claim to be open source, it should work to rebuild.

> Nothing in the GPL requires source to be rebuildable so that closed source 
> binary only apps can run unmodified on rebuilt binaries; kindof goes against 
> the spirit of the GPL, no?

Errr, what?   Working is a yes/no choice.  If you can't rebuild so it
works, it doesn't work.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
      lesmikes...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Reply via email to