> > What I'm left wondering is: > > 1) Why you are relying on PATH expansion for this from something as > critical as a cron job. It is good sysadmin practice to specify > explicit paths for situations like this rather than to worry about > whether or not there is a good or valid reason for there being 2 ftp > clients installed on the system. That was precisely my thought. I often noticed that people find it easier to blame others rather then questioning and rethinking their own actions... _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
- [CentOS] Two ftp clients? Why? James B. Byrne
- Re: [CentOS] Two ftp clients? Why? John R Pierce
- Re: [CentOS] Two ftp clients? Why? Jim Perrin
- Re: [CentOS] Two ftp clients? Why? Robert Heller
- Re: [CentOS] Two ftp clients? Why? Mike A. Harris
- Re: [CentOS] Two ftp clients? Why? Miguel Medalha
- Re: [CentOS] Two ftp clients? Why? Chris Weisiger
- Re: [CentOS] Two ftp clients? Why? m . roth
- Re: [CentOS] Two ftp clients? Why? Les Mikesell
- Re: [CentOS] Two ftp clients? Why... Brian Mathis
- Re: [CentOS] Two ftp clients?... Les Mikesell
- Re: [CentOS] Two ftp clients?... Keith Roberts
- Re: [CentOS] Two ftp clients?... Les Mikesell
- Re: [CentOS] Two ftp clients?... Warren Young
- Re: [CentOS] Two ftp clients?... Keith Roberts
- Re: [CentOS] Two ftp clients?... Benjamin Smith