> I'd probably argue that nss_ldap is fundamentally unfixable.  Why
*not* get
> behind sssd?  Have you given a recent version a try?
> 
> jh

Understandable, but since a lot of people are still going to stick with
CentOS 4/5 for legacy reasons, I would argue that nss_ldap is still
worth "fixing".

It's not as fancy as sssd of course, but it's what people are using
right now. :-)

Regards,
Mattias
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Reply via email to