On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 01:48, Les Mikesell <lesmikes...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 4/30/11 4:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote: >> Les, I don't understand you, sorry. You talk about something that I didn't >> ask for. You seem to make something of this thread that it isn't. > > You asked for something 'centos-y'. And there really is nothing specific to > centos other than it's differences from upstream., most of which aren't > technical. >
Might I suggest to investigate Scientific Linux as well? SL is also RHEL-based, but I do believe that some other packages are added. SL has had a 6.0 release, as well as 4.9. I don't know about 5.6, though. -- Dotan Cohen http://gibberish.co.il http://what-is-what.com _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
