----- Original Message ----
> From: "aurfal...@gmail.com" <aurfal...@gmail.com>
> To: CentOS mailing list <centos@centos.org>
> Sent: Tue, 12 April, 2011 20:10:14
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dag's RHEL Rebuild Project.
>
> On Apr 12, 2011, at 11:59 AM, Ian Murray wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >> This is really disrespectful to talk about on here. The devs spent
> >> a ton of
> >> their spare time to develop centos, last thing you should talk
> >> about is
> >> starting competing projects...
> >>
> >> Peter.
> >
> > I really don't get this list. The threads I have read on the Xen
> > list suggest
> > there is no problem with a discussion about the relative merits of
> > KVM so why is
> > everything so personal on this list? Something quite unhealthy is
> > going on here,
> > IMHO.
>
> Its not that at all (to me).
>
> Then again the Xen lists don't have ppl whining about a missed rel
> date with personal attaches about leadership.
I guess people are pretty happy with the way the Xen project is run.
>
> The guys maintaining Centos have ownership of the project which
> results in a sense of pride and personal feelings about it.
They have every right to be pride; no doubt a phenomenal amount of work goes
into CentOS and I don't think there is much/any gripe on this list of the
quality of the finished article. But of course, pride can be an inhibitor as
well..
>
> Plus, I think it was the timing of the post regarding DAGs RHEL like
> project.
Tensions are indeed running high, so yeah.
>
> There is an order of magnitude more traffic on this list then on the
> Xen list.
Erm, jury's out for me as to whether that would make a difference or not.
>
> - aurf
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
