On Mar 2, 2011, at 5:43 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 03/02/2011 04:45 PM, David Hrbáč wrote: >> Dne 2.3.2011 01:14, Dag Wieers napsal(a): >>>> From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CentOS >>> RHEL4: 2005-02-14 >>> CentOS-4: 2005-03-09 23 days >>> >>> RHEL5: 2007-03-14 >>> CentOS-5: 2007-04-12 29 days >>> >>> RHEL6: 2010-11-10 >>> CentOS-6: TBD 112+ days >>> >>> Priority is CentOS 5.6, which is what people are actually using. >>> It is >>> very likely a RHEL 6.1 Beta is out before CentOS-6.0. Early RHEL >>> 6.1 Beta >>> access has been offered by Red Hat to RHCE's already. >>> >> >> RHEL5.6: 2011-01-12 >> Centos-5.6: TBD 50+ days >> > > AND? > > Do you think we can't count? > > Do you think we are not trying or damnedest to get it done as fast > as we > possibly can? > > What, exactly, is the problem here? > > You have my permission to use something else. Does that help?
Dave, Wow you actually got a dev to waste time in responding to your post. I'd say your a pie hole, the brown eyed suzie kind. Go buy RHEL for a few hundies then. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
