On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:53:52AM -0600, Larry Vaden wrote: > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl <mailli...@conactive.com> > wrote: > >> While google perftools is not a part of either SL or CentOS, it *is* > >> in EPEL, and CentOS users can be users of EPEL > > > > Then it's on-topic on the EPEL list, not here. e.g. ask there for an > > updated version of the package. > > > > This wasn't the first instance. This guy has recently started a habit of > > copying mails (that are not his own it seems) that trip him off right to > > this list. That is bad practice. I do not want to get more of this. > > My effort was to understand the conditions under which CentOS and/or > SL would ever go to current edition for a particular component (e.g, > BIND) and I think I understand now and can resign from the list with > all due apologies to list members. > > kind regards/ldv
Kai's opinions are not shared by many of us. You're welcome back any time. Thanks, Ray _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
