On Jan 31, 2011, at 8:58 AM, Les Mikesell <lesmikes...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 1/31/11 3:20 AM, carlopmart wrote:
>> On 01/31/2011 04:05 AM, James A. Peltier wrote:
>>> ----- Original Message ----->  |>>
>>> |>
>>> |>   Correct.
>>> |
>>> | But I don't see how any of those things apply here. If the host fails
>>> | your vm's
>>> | are going to fail in any case, and there's not much magic involved in
>>> | exporting
>>> | an NFS share even if you need to move it. Iscsi targets are slightly
>>> | more
>>> | complicated because it's not included in the base Centos install but
>>> | you can
>>> | find howto's to set it up. When your resources are limited it looks
>>> | like a big
>>> | waste to add an unnecessary virtual layer to storage. I've done it the
>>> | other
>>> | way around, though, with NFS exports from the host being mounted by
>>> | the guest VM's.
>>> |
>>> | --
>>> | Les Mikesell
>>> | lesmikes...@gmail.com
>>> 
>>> I made no claims that it solved anything.  I merely noted why someone might 
>>> want to virtualize in place of NFS.  Personally, I don't think that the OP 
>>> really knows what they want, or they want the best of all worlds without 
>>> compromise.  I don't see how it is possible to provide what is being asked 
>>> for.  Really I think a minimum of two ideally a third server providing 
>>> iSCSI or NFS is needed for the solution to work.  That third machine should 
>>> have all of the possible host level redundancy possible to keep it running. 
>>>  If H/A is required at least two machines are required.
>>> 
>> 
>> Ok I will try to explain with more details. First, this installation it is 
>> for my
>> home personal use, It isn't for a production environment 24x7 or similar.
>> 
>> I have two physical hosts with this configuration:
>> 
>> HostA:
>> 
>>   - HP ML150
>>   - 5GB RAM
>>   - 3TB for storage with HP smartArray E200i
>>   - Intel Xeon QuadCore.
>> 
>> HostB:
>> 
>>    - HP ML115 G5
>>    - 8GB RAM
>>    - 160GB for storage
>>    - AMD QuadCore
>> 
>> Ok, lets go. I need (or I will like to do) to setup several virtual machines 
>> to
>> accomplish different tasks (remeber, It is for personal use, like a lab 
>> environment):
>> 
>>   - 1 virtual machine using as a DNS server and Kerberos authentication 
>> (CentOS or
>> RedHat)
>>   - 2 virtual machines with RHCS installed providing several services: smtp 
>> server
>> (only smtp), mirror updates, squid and cifs server. (with CentOS5)
>>   - 1 virtual machine with Windows 7 as a workstation.
>>   - 1 virtual machine with Windows 2008 R2 server.
>>   - 2 virtual machines with RHCS installed with OSSEC. Snort. Snortby and 
>> Splunk
>> server (with CentOS5 too)
>>   - 2 virtual machines with OpenBSD firewalls with CARP and load balancing.
>>   - 1 virtual machine as a DMZ Server.
>> 
>> My idea is to install DNS server (with kerberos auth) and 2 virtual virtual 
>> machines
>> with RHCS and common services linke smtp, squid, etc onto HP ML150. And the 
>> others
>> virtual machines running on HP ML115 server.
>> 
>> Where is the problem?? Problem is the storage. All storage resides on the HP 
>> ML150
>> server. For that reason I need to install a server as a virtual storage to 
>> run most
>> of the virtual machines running on the server HP ML115 with the exception of
>> firewalls and the DMZ server that resides on the HP ML115's local disk.
>> 
>> For backups I have an external usb disk with 1TB.
> 
> You can probably make that work if you don't care much about performance, but 
> it 
> would be much better to toss at least one more drive in the the ML115 - and 
> maybe more RAM in both.  Even better if you can add several drives and keep 
> each 
> VM that is active (the firewalls/DNS server, etc. shouldn't be busy but the 
> squid will unless you disable the disk cache) on its own drive.  And more RAM 
> would help too.

I would probably take the memory from the 115 and put it in the 150 and have 1 
highly usable system instead of a .75 and .50 usable system.

That's if I couldn't buy more memory. I would say 8GB is a min, 16GB preferred, 
32GB is great. Are these single socket or dual socket?

Can the smart array be shared between two hosts?

-Ross
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Reply via email to