On Jan 11, 2011, at 6:28 PM, Christopher Chan wrote: > On Wednesday, January 12, 2011 10:07 AM, compdoc wrote: >> I never said it was native. zfs-fuse.x86_64 >> > > Not a Centos or a RHEL package. Please don't bring up experimental > software in threads that are comparing filesystems for production use. > > If you want to suggest ZFS, you should suggest that the OP go with > Solaris or FreeBSD although I won't touch ZFS on the latter with a ten > foot pole. Nevermind that I run OpenIndiana and OpenSolaris for ZFS > instead of Solaris.
Nope, this OP will be sticking with Centos. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
