On 12/8/2010 3:41 PM, Warren Young wrote:
>
> /That/ is my point. I could -- and sometimes do -- work around file
> permissions errors manually, quickly. SELinux has a higher order of
> complexity compared to Unix file permissions, so the associated fixes
> don't fit into a small, easy-to-mentally-model framework. Each fix
> therefore becomes a one-off that you have to write down in a document or
> script else you'd have to rediscover them with Google every time.
Is there any central reporting concept in SELinux so a multi-machine
admin doesn't have to go check each for all of the one-off cases and
knowledge can be shared about the fixes needed for 3rd party RPMs?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
