On 12/7/10 11:10 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>> I have a route to his dsl router, which, assuming that the ipv4 and
>> ipv6 firewalls are as good at allowing/disallowing access, makes his
>> current ipv4 and his future ipv6 addresses equally accessible.
>
> I've been following the NAT debate here and something occurred to me.
>
> If you have an IPv4 network with NAT, an attacker doesn't need to know
> your internal IPs. All he needs is the IP to your router. NAT will
> nicely forward his packets along to whichever internal computer handles
> the port.
What port/computer would that be? Most consumer routers default to not
forwarding anything that is not related to prior outbound activity.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
