On 10.5.2010 12.50, Kahlil Hodgson wrote:
> I'd opt for NAT and policy-based routing. I'll get back to you with
> details after I've had my diner ;-)
>
> Cheers!
>
> Kal
Hm, NAT might be difficult, because there are common ports to the guest
systems. Below is more detail:
If we say network
A = 62.220.237.x and
B = 62.236.221.x
My guest systems are:
- name server (port 53) (network B)
- mail server (80,443,25,465,995.993,563,636) (network A)
- secondary mail server to a mail server in another box (25,465)
(preferably network A AND B, for maximum availability)
- a test system, can be in either network (but port 22 required)
Of course I could rearrange, for example set up another xen box for one
of these mail servers.
- Jussi
--
Jussi Hirvi * Green Spot
Topeliuksenkatu 15 C * 00250 Helsinki * Finland
Tel. +358 9 493 981 * Mobile +358 40 771 2098 (only sms)
jussi.hi...@greenspot.fi * http://www.greenspot.fi
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
