> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Niki wrote:
>>> JohnS a écrit :
>>>> ---
>> <snip>
>>>> You should have better success with another 128MB of RAM..
>> <snip>
>>> I corrected that problem, and now it *looks* like everything's OK. But
>>> you're right. Another 128 MB RAM won't hurt. (My first computer, a
>>> single-board 8080, actually had 512 *bytes* of RAM, so it's just a
>>> matter of adapting to modern times :oD)
>>
>> *heh* I remember the first computer I owned, and my ex and a friend
>> violated the warranty on the RadShack CoCo, opened it up, and doubled
>> the memory for a birthday present. Then, I had 32K ram! (Are you sure you
>> didn't mean 512K RAM?)
>
> Not unless it had some additional hardware assistance. The 8080 can only
> address 64K.
Apologies - I was thinking 8088. Name doesn't sound at *all* alike.... <g>
mark
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
