From: Christopher Chan Sent: November 25, 2009 15:50 > >> Also in the steps you have taken above you are stopping bind > >> via rndc stop and then trying to start it with the unknown > >> "start" command. Even if "start" was known it would not work, > >> rndc communicated directly with named, and since it was already > >> stopped in a previous step there is no way that your "start" > >> (or any other command, reload, flush, whatever) could work at > >> that point. > > > > That would explain a lot but it would have been more useful if the > > rndc command had returned an error saying something like "start > > command unknown" rather than accepting the command and indicating > > a communication problem. > > So file a bug with the BIND developers about this rather obvious > 'bug'.
Good suggestion and I have done so. hec -- Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
