Am 23.10.09 19:56, schrieb Ian Murray: > >> The dates are likely based on when the ISO was actually created. Therefore, >> if the ISO was generated on Oct. 1st and no issues were found with it in QA, >> then the date you are seeing on the mirrors is correct. The ISOs are based >> on the original 5.4 tree and don't include updates that Red Hat released >> after the initial release of RHEL 5.4. > > As far as I remember, some subsequent RH updates are rolled-into the CentOS > release. Someone more familiar with the build process may clarify that.
No, they aren't. This time we pushed the "0day" updates from Red Hat to the 5.3 tree (new kernel and a few other things). The ISOs have the same software in the same versions as upstrem has, we're not slipstreaming anything into there. Ralph _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
