Scott Silva wrote:
> on 5-14-2009 1:24 PM Pasi � spake the following:
>> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 06:23:05PM +0200, Bernhard Gschaider wrote:
>>> Thank you all for your quick answers (you guys must have started
>>> typing BEFORE I hit the Send-button).
>>>
>>> The general consensus seems to be "If you can start anew: use
>>> XFS". This leaves one question: as the XFS is not included in the
>>> standard-kernel which option offers the "smoothest sailing"
>>> (especially during kernel-updates):
>> It seems XFS might be added as a default to RHEL 5.4..
>>
> Probably not a default, but an option.
Is this a reasonable choice on a 32 bit machine? I thought 4k stacks
were a problem.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
