Andrew Cotter wrote: > > My problem would be that a single machine is a single point of failure. We > are looking at zimbra and using at least two machines utilizing GFS and our > SAN so we can withstand a failure.
Wouldn't drbl/heartbeat be less complicated for 2 machines?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
