On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 2:27 PM, John Hinton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, so does anybody have a good firewall rule solution for what we're > supposed to be doing with bind these days? Obviously port 53 is no longer > enough.
Consider using djbdns instead of BIND. It sounds like an excellent alternative to BIND. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Djbdns> _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
