"nate" wrote:
> Security is pretty important for me too. For this, and other reasons
> I never point yum to 3rd party repositories. I only run CentOS/RHEL
> on servers. I run Debian on desktops(due to larger package selection
> and still long release cycles for stable). And usually Ubuntu on
> laptops(for more current hardware support).

Debian? Didn't they have a *pretty* dangerous hold in their SSL packages just 
some weeks ago?

Especially if it gets to security, I don't think that Debian is a good 
solution. AFAIR they also got their servers hacked several times for several 
different reasons. Not very trustworthy, IMHO. And those political discussions 
*suck*! For example I want "Firefox" and *not* "Iceweasel".

> If security is a top priority, and you really want to use CentOS/RHEL,
> then don't use 3rd party packages, period. Otherwise I suggest you
> find a distro that supports the applications you wish to run directly
> or maintain them yourself.

I'm searching for a distribution for several *months* now and so far I couldn't 
find something that fits my needs...

CentOS seems to be pretty well done, but the amount of packages that is 
delivered with it definetly doesn't fit all needs. Today, I tried to set up a 
server with CentOS (VMWare server). Worked pretty well, but for installing the 
NTFS driver, I had to import the rpmforge repository...

> And of course security/stability rarely means having the latest version.

Of course.

Am I on the right list? Not very much answers, so far...

CU

Manuel
-- 
()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html mail
/\                        - gegen HTML-Mail
answers as html mail will be deleted automatically!
Antworten als HTML-Mail werden automatisch gelöscht!

GMX startet ShortView.de. Hier findest Du Leute mit Deinen Interessen!
Jetzt dabei sein: http://www.shortview.de/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Reply via email to