Jay Leafey wrote: > Another alternative that we are examining is using OCFS2 (Oracle Cluster > File System 2) and iSCSI for the shared storage with Heartbeat for > service management. This combination looks to be a bit "lighter" than > the Cluster Suite and GFS, but I'm hoping to confirm or disprove that > impression this summer in my "copious free time".
ocfs isnt really worth spending time on anymore. iirc, even oracle no longer support an ocfs/ocfs2 based backend store. might as well consider gpfs ( the cost per machine isnt that high, and there is reasonable assurances that it would work ). /me is still thrashing out gfs2 though, and conga! and clusterlvm! -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
