Rudi Ahlers wrote: > Ralph Angenendt wrote: >> Because it would be shooting cannons at birds in this particular case. >> If you need to expose both nodes "to the public" all the time, you >> probably also run the software on both nodes - which would be more of a >> cluster than a failover setup >:) >> > But, a cluster in itself is fail over :) If either node is dead, the > cluster is still up
I really wouldn't always count on that >:) Cheers, Ralph
pgpUUbkvceY0i.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
