Am 08.11.21 um 09:59 schrieb Götz Reinicke:
Hi,
From time to time I see different errors for dnf-makecache in the logs. e.g.
„Errors during downloading metadata“, „Couldn't connect to server for“, „Timeout was
reached“, „Couldn't resolve host name " or „Operation too slow“.
In all cases, a restart of the service solves the „problem“ and in other cases
the next run dose it.
Beside having the errors, our current service monitoring triggers in most cases
a warning message, and depending on the solution recovers too, which makes me
wonder what would be the best practice for such situation.
a) do I need dnf-makecache? Will it speed up things so much and makes package
management much more easy, so having some errors is o.k.?
b) adjust the config for dnf-makecache, so it will trigger less errors?
c) adjust our monitoring to ignore some errors or be more soft with triggering
warnings?
C is the least preferred option right now.
What do you think, how do you handle dnf-makecache?
It depends on your needs. We are okay with; stopping
and disabling dnf-makecache.timer for prod systems.
We have dnf-automatic enabled. So, the cache is
rebuilded anyway ...
--
Leon
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
