On 8/7/19 8:02 AM, isdtor wrote:
isdtor writes:

Can I really be the only user of Mate on Centos 7??
No, definitely not. I use MATE on C7, because Gnome is, how do I
say this politely..., um, horrible. Not a KDE fan either.

Gnome-2.x wasn't broken, didn't need to be thrown away and
replaced by something completely different.
Not broken, but full of bugs that will never get fixed.

I did a while back rebuild the EPEL rpms for 1.20. There are spec files I could 
make available but I can't find the build environemnt setup now. It involves 
mock, a custom local repo to receive the fresh builds as you don't want to pull 
in the rpms from EPEL, and a build script that defines the order, among other 
things. If I have time next week I can try and locate everything.
I have done the hard lifting and rebuilt mate 1.22 on CentOS 7. It's not 
without quirks, and I haven't actually installed and tested, but I'm willing to 
make the srpms available - without any commitments. This might make a good 
addition to Nux :)



The person responsible for packaging the mate RPMs for EPEL offered to hand that off to someone, which I considered (since I'm a Fedora/EPEL packager), but was reluctant to offer without understanding how much heavy lifting was involved.  Also, I wasn't sure how much the mate on CentOS user community wants to stick with 1.16 vs. upgrade to 1.22.  What kind of "quirks" did you run into?

-Greg

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Reply via email to