In article <cagkb5vfxkjcbpqwupuzg0xp8_gtgv+55+yrzf8vdf0maio9...@mail.gmail.com>, James Hogarth <james.hoga...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 3 March 2017 at 11:47, James Hogarth <james.hoga...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 3 March 2017 at 11:34, John Hodrien <j.h.hodr...@leeds.ac.uk> wrote: > >> On Fri, 3 Mar 2017, Tony Mountifield wrote: > >> > >>> You mean just thrown away, or archived somewhere? Just thrown away would > >>> seem rather irresponsible... > >> > >> Mirroring EPEL makes sense well before this point, as they don't keep old > >> versions of packages online either AFAIK. > >> > >> jh > > > > Indeed they aren't kept ... and since there hasn't been an EOL of EPEL > > before I honestly have no idea ... I've asked on the epel-devel > > mailing list as to whether it'll move to archive like old fedora > > releases do. > > My mistake - I forgot there was an EPEL4 in the mists of time .. so > the last version of the repo is likely to end up here: > > http://archive.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/
Cool, thanks! Tony -- Tony Mountifield Work: t...@softins.co.uk - http://www.softins.co.uk Play: t...@mountifield.org - http://tony.mountifield.org _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
